World Cup 2010, Day 3

Group C, Slovenia 1, Algeria 0—bo-o-o-o-o-o-ring; the kind of game that haters would point to to justify their hatred. Algeria’s long passes rarely connected, and they had a hard time adapting to a crisper, shorter-passing approach. Slovenia was hardly better, scoring only on a goalie mistake almost as bad as Robert Green’s, and that against a side that was down a man. (The red card against Algeria’s Ghezzal was totally uncontroversial; his decision to hand-ball the pass down in the box was a stupid one.) Neither team looked in the same class as their group opponents.

That said, the win puts Slovenia atop the group and therefore makes them dangerous. The U. S. almost certainly has to beat Slovenia now; a draw probably won’t be good enough.  The fact that they must win will make the Yanks more aggressive—but will that play into Slovenia’s hands?

Group D, Serbia 0,  Ghana 1—much more interesting game than the day’s first one. Not only are both teams are better than Algeria and Slovenia, but the game had a much better flow, especially in the second half. Ghana are an entertaining squad, with their youth, quickness, and speed resulting in some compelling play. Still, Serbia’s center-backs locked down the Black Star attack in the box for most of the game. Lukovic’s second yellow card, in the 74th minute, was a legitimate call, but the Serbs played well down a man, with a couple of real chances on the counterattack (Kingson making a remarkable save on one).

The key, of course, was the 83rd-minute penalty for handball. Kuzmanovic complained vociferously, but none of his teammates did—because the referee was absolutely right in his call. Gyan easily nailed the PK, and that was ball game (though the Serbs did have a couple of chances in the last ten minutes).

Group D, Germany 4, Australia 0—What’s to say? Germany dominated the pitch in every way, especially in midfield, where the Socceroos allowed the Germans far too much possession. For much of the game, Germany put on an impressive of short, crisp passing and gorgeous, on-target crosses. Unlike most of the games so far, the score was indicative of the quality of the two sides.  The red card call on Aussie Tim Cahill was certainly rash but almost just as certainly irrelevant to the outcome.  Die Mannschaft looks the class of the Cup as we approach the midway point of the first series of matches.  I can’t wait for their matchup with Ghana; both teams will probably go through, so their game won’t be determinative of anything, but they’re clearly the best two in Group D, and that makes the game something to watch.

Advertisements

2 Responses to World Cup 2010, Day 3

  1. George says:

    Thanks for reviving the blog Lar, perhaps this outlet will help cure you of your comic aspirations. 🙂 I too am DVR’ing all the matches, although with two 1 year-olds who like to be up early, I’ve been catching many of the 730 matches live. The vuvuzela’s that have been driving everyone crazy have been our household’s background noise for the past week. I really don’t care too much except on two accounts: 1) The singing and chanting that mark most futbol contests are no longer present (or drowned out). 2) ESPN/ABC have admitted that they’ve minimized the crowd feed in their audio. That sucks. At times when goals have been scored (or almost scored) you could barely hear the crowd roar. In fact, I feel like the announcers have had to tell us that the crowd was in a frenzy. I mean, I watched South Africa in its improbable draw against Les Bleus, a monumental moment for RSA, and you could hardly tell. In regards to your comment re: the haters, things have been a bit slow. Grant Wahl of SI.com reports that goal scoring is well down from the last three WC’s. The Jabulani ball, the high altitude, may all play a role. All the same, one of the most wonderful quadrennial events of all time. I personally feel that the US-UK draw, and Slovenia’s victory, may mean that one of those Anglo teams might not make it out of the group. I was certainly upset that two of my favorites were in the same group. Also a Dutch and Deutsch fan. Wouldn’t that be a killer final four?

    • Larry says:

      Hey George! Thanks for replying–I can’t even get my own family to even READ this thing!

      I haven’t been terribly impressed by the second games of the teams that excelled in their first games. Argentina has big problems defensively; Germany spit the bit big time (though the red card for Klose was a joke); South Korea–well, I guess we can chalk up their first win as a fluke, eh? Here’s hoping that the Dutch can reverse this tide.

      Re: low score: the scoring has certainly picked up in the second round of games, largely, I think, as teams have a much better idea of what they need to do to advance and, as a result, play more offensively. Nobody wants to lose in their first game–but drawing puts more pressure on Game 2 outcomes.

      I still love the vuvuzelas–SA’ers aren’t chanters and singers; they’re blowers and dancers!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: